I vaguely recall seeing the original 1951 film The Day the Earth Stood Still, but it
was many years ago so I had to use Wiki to refresh my memory in order to
compare it with the 2008 remake which I saw recently. I learned something from
this, which is that the 1951 film was based on the short story Farewell to the Master (1940) by Harry
Bates, not one that I recall reading.
The 2008 remake sticks quite closely to the general plot and
spirit of the original with some changes to the detail, partly to take
advantage of modern CGI. To summarise (with spoilers – skip the rest of this
paragraph if you don't want to know what happened): a huge, transparent, globe
filled with swirling patterns arrives from space and lands in Central Park, New
York. It is promptly surrounded by military forces plus some selected
scientists. A humanoid figure emerges from the sphere but is shot and wounded;
a giant robot then emerges and shuts down the power to the weapons. The
humanoid (who turns out to be physically human once the outer covering is
removed and bears a remarkable resemblance to Keanu Reeves) is taken away by
the military from whom he is helped to escape by one of the scientists, Dr
Helen Benson (Jennifer Connelly). He has a message from an association of
civilisations in the galactic vicinity who have become worried about human
aggressiveness: change, or be exterminated. He eventually decides that humanity
will never change and sets in motion world-wide destruction of humanity and its
works (the opportunity for some novel CGI), before Benson puts in a final
appeal for a reprieve.
It clearly would not be fair to assess the 2008 film by the
same standards as the 1951 version. The original was a ground-breaking film
which has rightly become a classic; the new version merely updates the story
for a modern audience. Ignoring the original for the moment and judging the
2008 version on its merits, it is not a bad SF thriller and is painless to
watch, although not particularly gripping. Perhaps the worst aspect is the
comic-book military action, including one point of detail which particularly
jarred with me: someone in the production team was obviously impressed by the
name "Sidewinder" since they used Sidewinder missiles to attack the
globe on two occasions. In fact, this is a short-range air-to-air missile with
a very small warhead, which is just about the least suitable missile in the US
inventory for attacking such a target.
Overall, not a film worth making a point of watching, but
bearable. Probably more rewarding to spend the time watching the 1951 original,
which although obviously dated is a genuine landmark.
2 comments:
It had been some time since I had seen the original film, so I got both and watched them back to back.
My conclusions were the same as yours. Watch the original version if there's only time for one film. Michael Rennie is far more convincing than Reeves.
Thanks for confirming that, Fred.
Post a Comment