It's rather difficult to know where to begin with this one. Noah is of course a retelling of the
Biblical story (which is actually much older, featuring in the myths of earlier
civilisations than the Israelites). It is a very long time since I read the Old
Testament story so my memory is a little hazy in places, but I must admit I
can't recall anything about fallen angels, turned into rock giants for their
sins, doing the heavy lifting involved in building the ark and then defending
it against all comers. Oh well, accuracy is not a particularly valued commodity
in Hollywood – drama wins out every time!
The result seems likely to polarise opinion. If you like
this kind of mythological religious epic, then you'll probably enjoy Noah as it's a grand spectacular with lots
of CGI. If you don't, then it's more than two hours of grim and rather tedious
emoting and declaiming, interspersed with scenes of noisy violence, without a
smile to be had. My sympathies lie in the latter camp.
To move on from the film: why was the story of a great flood
so common in various civilisations in the Middle East? It seems reasonable to
suppose that there was some cataclysmic event that so imprinted itself on the
memories of those who experienced it that it became part of the folklore of their
tribes, but what could it reasonably be? Some have suggested a major flood
involving the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, the "cradle of
civilisation". But there is another candidate, potentially much more
devastating in its effects: the joining of the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.
It is known that for some time after the end of the last Ice Age (during the
period when the first towns and civilisations were becoming established) the
two seas were separated by a land bridge connecting Europe and Asia, where
Istanbul is now sited. Some researchers argue that the water level in the Black
Sea was much lower at that time, and that when the Mediterranean eventually
broke through (they estimate about 7,500 years ago), the level of the Black Sea
was raised considerably over quite a short period of time – about a year. There
is reportedly evidence of settlements at some depth in the Black Sea, where the
old coastline might have been.
It is easy to see how such an event could account for the
Noah myth. The relentless rise in sea level would have flooded coastal
settlements, forcing a mass migration. Some parts of the coast would initially
have been cut off by the rising water level, becoming temporary islands, some
of which might have been settled. As these islands steadily shrank, so the
people on them would have faced the need to get to the mainland. It is easy to
imagine makeshift rafts being made on which all of the people's possessions,
including domesticated animals, were piled. The tendency in oral traditions for
stories to grow in the telling would have accounted for the rest of the myth. However,
this theory has been challenged by other scientists, so perhaps some other natural
catastrophe was the origin of the story.
2 comments:
Thanks for the review. Sounds like a film to avoid wasting time and money on.
I couldn't disagree...
Post a Comment