During the
late 1960s lighthearted spy films and TV series were in vogue, the blend of
adventure, glamour and comedy proving very appealing. A good example is the
series of feature films starring Dean Martin as agent Matt Helm, and even the
doyen of all such spies, James Bond, was increasingly playing it for laughs
(although it didn't become a spoof of itself until Roger Moore took over from
Sean Connery in the 1970s). Perhaps the most highly regarded of the TV shows
(in the UK anyway) was the British series The
Avengers - no, not the current lot, the one featuring agents John Steed and
especially the marvellous Emma Peel. Into this particular niche dropped the
extremely successful US series The Man
From U.N.C.L.E., which ran for 105 episodes between 1964 and 1968. I saw
many of those when they first appeared on UK TV and remember the principal
characters very well, but I've not watched them since, so I was prompted more
by curiosity than anything else to view this remake.
The lead
character is played by Henry Cavill (currently featuring as Superman, vs Batman
that is) who plays Napoleon Solo in quite a similar way to the suave original,
Robert Vaughn. His Russian sidekick Ilya Kuyakin is very different, however: I
recall David McCallum as small and mild-mannered, but the tall and powerful
Armie Hammer plays Ilya as a ruthless, humourless and downright psychotic
killer. In the TV series these were the two main characters with only their
boss Waverly also featuring regularly, but in this film they are joined by
reluctant recruit Gaby, to whom the ubiquitous Alicia Vikander brings some star
quality.
The
1960s-set plot isn't really the point, it's merely the necessary backdrop to
the entertainment, but for what it's worth it involves the bad guys persuading
a nuclear scientist to make an atom bomb for delivery to the remnants of the
Nazis. Solo and Kuryakin, initially enemies, are directed to cooperate to
thwart the evil plotters. Of course they succeed (sorry about the spoiler!)
with various laughs on the way, and the finale prepares the way for a sequel.
The film seems to have been moderately successful, so we'll have to wait and
see if another appears.
**************************
The
Australian film Predestination was
not what I had expected. I had vaguely thought it was an action movie about
time-travelling agents, but it turned out to be something much more subtle and
complex than that, with very little action. It is based on Heinlein's short
story "-All You Zombies-",
which I don't remember reading. The plot did however remind me of another short
story by the same author, By His
Bootstraps, which is explained by the fact that AYZ is reportedly a kind of developed version of the ideas in BHB. It also reminded me of the more
recent film Looper, reviewed on this
blog in Febrary 2013.
Predestination is the kind of film which it is very difficult
to write about without spoilers. So I will just say that it involves a whole
layer-cake of time-travel paradoxes piling on each other, with scenes sometimes
replayed from different viewpoints to reveal entirely different perspectives on
events. It is clever and absorbing, but you have to be on your mental toes to
keep up. The downside is that this is yet another film which demonstrates that
single-timeline time-travel is really not possible for practical (as opposed to
technological) reasons. I enjoyed the gradual revelation of what was actually
going on, but at the end was left feeling "but that's completely
impossible!", even though each individual element seemed logical (sort
of). Despite this, if you like this kind of puzzle, watch the film!
3 comments:
I have read both of Heinlein's stories and have seen the film. The film is very close to the story, aside from the attempt to prevent a terrorist bombing. That was not part of the story. If one removes that from the film, then what remains is very faithful to "All You Zombies."
By the way, the title of the other story, "By His Bootstraps," is clearly related to the story, but I'm unable to relate "All You Zombies" to anything in the story. Perhaps "Zombies" is a futuristic slang term of some sort.
Thanks for the info, I suspect that turning a short story into a film generated the opposite problem that film makers experience when using a novel as the basis i.e. not enough material! So the terrorist plot gets added.
On reflection, the story could be used to demonstrate that single-timeline time travel is physically impossible: time-travel can only make sense in a multiverse, with each jump backwards creating a different time-line (as in The Proteus Operation I reviewed last week).
Yes, that was my reaction to the additional material in the film--needed to flesh it out to make a film of a decent length.
I have always had trouble with time travel stories, especially the sort where characters blithely climb into a machine and travel as easy as getting into one's vehicle and driving off. Usually I just increase tenfold my suspension of disbelief and go on.
Post a Comment