The Martian is one of those films with a simple and
straightforward plot about which not a lot can be said. There are obvious
comparisons with Gravity, the 2013
film which also concentrated on a single astronaut's efforts to get home after
a disaster in space. That film concentrated on the experience of being in space
– the silence, the awkwardness in a bulky space suit, the disorientation of
having no "up" or "down", the sharp clarity of the stations
in the airless sunlight, the jaw-dropping views. The Martian is rather more conventional in that most of it takes
place on Mars or on Earth. The views of "Mars" are spectacular but
not that alien (they were shot in
Jordan) so the focus is more on the human and scientific story of how the hero
(Matt Damon) manages to stay alive when accidentally left behind on the planet while
desperate attempts are made to send a rescue mission.
This is an
involving story, one for adults to appreciate. A couple of technical aspects
bothered me – maybe they were explained, but if so I missed them. First,
although there is much emphasis on the shortage of food and water, oxygen seems
in plentiful supply. Huge quantities of it are lost every time the airlock or
rover vehicle is opened, and more when hydrazine is burned to create water, but
there seem to be no worries about running out of it, so where is it all coming
from? The requirement is far more than could feasibly be met by carrying it on
the lander.
The second
point concerns the decision to send the spacecraft back to collect the stranded
man. The huge increase in the time the other astronauts would spend in space is
discussed, but only in terms of the length of time they would spend away from
their families – the problem of exposure to radiation is not mentioned. Every
recent analysis of the practical problems of manned missions to Mars I have
read focuses on the danger of radiation as the most difficult to tackle; the
background levels of radiation in space and on Mars are much higher than they
are on Earth, and one solar flare sweeping though the craft could prove fatal.
Genetic damage seems almost inevitable and the cancer risk increased, leading
to suggestions that only pensioners should be sent on such missions. Despite
this, two of the astronauts are shown at the end of the film, married and with
a baby, which made me wince a bit.
More
generally, I couldn't help thinking that the feelgood ending was more than a
little unlikely. As with Gravity,
the likely consequences of any such disasters would be a complete lack of
survivors! Despite these niggles it is an enjoyable film, well worth seeing.
No comments:
Post a Comment